Alex Mathiasen <a...@mira.dk> a écrit :
>Dear recipients,
>
>I have been using OpenBGP for a while with OpenBSD - And I am very
>satisfied
>with the performance and amazed by the ease of configuration.
>
>My BGPD is configured against a Danish ISP called TDC - And we were
>previously
>configured to receive a full routing table.
>
>However a few months ago I ran into an issue where my BGPD stopped
>working
>properly.
>
>It appeared the BGPD kept receiving the routing tables, and then start
>all
>over.
>
>Looking into the log files, it appeared BGPD received a certain route
>in the
>routing table, and then grumbled about the prefix, apparently for some
>reason
>the result was BGPD kept reloading when it reached this route. The
>result was
>of course my network was down.
>
>As TDC (My ISP) couldn't resolve which route that caused this issue
>(They told
>me: "That's what happened when you use third party software", so no
>help
>there...), we agreed that my connection would be set to Default
>candidate,
>instead of receiving a full routing table.
>
>So now I have configured a static route to forward all my traffic to
>this
>route. However this is not the result I wanted, as I am about to have
>one more
>connection, so I have 2 connections outbound.
>
>But the automatic failover switch / load balancing won't work, as long
>as I
>have my static route.
>
>This is why I want to go back to receiving a full routing table.
>
>Is there any way of configuring BGPD to ignore a specific route in case
>of
>"corrupted" prefix, so this won't happened again?
>
>I hope that some of you have an answer for this...
>
>Here you can see my bgpd.conf:
>
>AS 0000
>router-id 000.000.000.000
>network 000.000.000.00/00
>
>neighbor 000.000.000.000 {
> remote-as 0000
> descr TDC
> local-address 000.000.000.000
> passive
> holdtime 180
> holdtime min 3
> tcp md5sig password 0000000000
>}
>
>log updates
Hi,
Please have a look in archives for a similar thread i did initiate.
