There are *PATENTS* involved.
So even reveres engineering things does not solve the problem.
Reverse engineered code is still *PATENTED*.
You have to write new original code to avoid PATENTS.
Who wants to do that?????
I would guess, no one on the OBSD team.
It's not worth it. 

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013, at 03:30 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I know that it has been requested to stop bother OpenBSD users with ZFS,
> but there are a few not-quite-right things that I want to precise.  This
> will be my last post on the subject.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:54:13PM -0500, goodb0fh wrote:
> > On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:57 PM, Matthias Appel <appel.matth...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > .
> > > 
> > > That is what I wanted to say....so if there Is ZFS-a and ZFS-b, why call 
> > > both of them ZFS?
> 
> Historically there was a single ZFS in OpenSolaris (and Solaris).  Other
> OSes, esp. FreeBSD, brought it in their code base.  Then Oracle closed
> the source and put additional features.  The other-ZFS that stayed
> opensource in illumos and gained additional features as well.  So yes
> they are incompatible, they have the same name, this is annoying.  But I
> don't think any of them is more legitimate to be called ZFS.  
> 
> I think (hope?) over time, people will prefix "ZFS" with something that
> describes the branch unambiguously, like "Oracle ZFS" on one hand and
> "OSS ZFS" / "illumos ZFS" on the other.
> 
> 
> > ZFS has version numbers.  They are backward but not forward compatible
> > so newer code can mount older ZFS but not the other way round.  As
> > version increases, capabilities increases, from supporting
> > compression, more compression options, dedup and finally, in the
> > version in Solaris 11, encryption as well.
> > 
> > All Illumos/opensolaris versions of ZFS do not support ZFS type
> > encryption, sadly.
> 
> This was true until Oracle closed the source because there was only one
> linear monotonically-increasing version number which clearly identified
> which features were available in the pool.  
> 
> Oracle basically ignores the other ZFS so they have stayed on the same
> track.  On the other hand, illumos is well aware that this may be a
> problem in the future so, as Bryan Horstmann-Allen explained.  That way
> there can be multiple ZFS versions, the feature flag will indicate which
> feature were supported when the pool was created.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Jeremie Le Hen
> 
> Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
> They forgot to mention Morons.

Reply via email to