On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:38:18PM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote: > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 14:36 +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > > > Pass LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool on make's command line. > > > > Trying to get through the spaghetti of gnu autocrap only leads to > > insanity. > > > > That falls under the "don't fight that shit, it's hopeless". > > Hm, OpenBSD libtool doesn't seem to honour the argument '-version-number > 2:1', so my resulting library is 'libopenconnect.so.0.0' instead of > 'libopenconnect.so.2.1'. > > Should I be specifying that differently?
Found this in the GNU libtool documentation: "New projects should use the -version-info flag instead." It looks like -version-number is an accepted option (thus no error message), but no further processing is done on it. May be an oversight in our libtool? Note that the ports system overrides the version specified on the command line, to fit into the OpenBSD-specific versioning scheme. > > -- > Sent with MeeGo's ActiveSync support. > > David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre > david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature > which had a name of smime.p7s]
