On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 00:40, David Diggles wrote: > I'm interested in hearing about peoples experiences with spam filtering > the spam > emails that make it through to misc. Mostly non-english. I have been using > SpamAssassin and training it, yet the bayes in default weightings are not > enough > to get the misc spams into my spam box... in fact many still autolearn as > ham.
I adjusted the scores so that anything with bayes probability greater than 50 is spam. That works pretty well. Not really any reason to go past 5, but I figured if I ever changed the minimum I'd be ready. score BAYES_50 5 score BAYES_60 6 score BAYES_80 8 score BAYES_95 9 score BAYES_99 10
