On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:31, Marc Espie wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: >> IIRC, Theo did the current design himself after everyone else failed to > come up with something good. > > Well, Theo had some rather fun constraints, like making a web site that works > with antiquated browsers, like "no css". > > If that constraint gets lifted (Theo ? is your browser still stuck in 1990 > ?), > then it would probably be possible to have something that looks the same / > looks better and less painful to change...
CSS should fall back gracefully. It works well enough with lynx anyway, where graphical positioning is useless. Is netscape 4 still something we need to support?
