On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:00:17 -0500, Daniel Ouellet <dan...@presscom.net>
wrote:
Have fun, but please read the RFC and don't suggest assignment based on
school of thought. Try to do it right from the start and save you pain
down the road now.
The number of customers asking for IPv6 right now I can probably count on
one hand, so this can quickly be changed. Your mention of the routing
table has me thinking about some long-term dire consequences though. And
yes, this is going to be a comedy of errors for quite some time. People
can't grasp the concept of firewalling+routing vs firewalling+NAT. We have
customers with /24s who choose to do 1:1 NAT at their firewall instead of
just routing the damn IPs. And then they wonder why they have to upgrade
their firewall hardware because it can't handle that many NAT
entries/states....
