On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff <czark...@gmail.com> wrote: > So you state that the fact that "if one chooses to use the whole disk, > the whole disk is used" needs further documentation?
Well, since this is the one of the few (only?) destructive actions the installer takes I can certainly see why being really clear could be considered an improvement. That said, I have never had this problem myself but maybe that's because I only very rarely install on multi-boot systems. I don't need this particular feature but it won't bother me if it is implemented either. > Hell no! There is no improvement in making 100% clear statement twice as > long just because of one user who failed to read that statement. More > precisely, it is clear direct damage, as it makes the "text/information" > ratio twice as high with no increase in the "information" part. I can remember when people said similar things about the installer in the early 2000's. Funny how it has been improved since then with all kinds of stuff, like not having to manually calculate the slice sizes and deal with LBA/CHS etc. Cheers, Lars
