1.
On the long run cvs(1) will die, and be replaced by Schily SCCS
(oh god, why does v6 not have any branch name info, too??), which
will rule the world.
Without having the need to use GNU autoconf at all, so that
software will compile with make(1) not gmake(1).
Make bootstrapping easy.
Freedom!
Peace!!
Love!!!
Yup.
2.
I like my patch.
And my daily dose of Hypericum; highly recommendet.
Jan Stary wrote [2012-02-09 13:16+0100]:
[.]
> Actually, cvs(1) says:
[.]
This is not true for cvs(1) on MacOS X (Snow Leopard), btw.
And heaven knows if a Linux system does have any manpages at all!
Right?? (TinyCore definitely has none.)
> Yes, but it will also change the content of CVS/Root
> in directories that existed before.
Huh?
But that's right, push the people to it!
The current FAQ does not massage CVS/Root related brain cells!
> I think this is blind typing without understanding
I quote myself (quotes removed from sites though, so it may not be
remembered 100 percent correctly):
I use version control daily, but i don't want to think about
it.
(It was due to our massive internal hg(1)/git(1) war, and my
favorite hg(1) - the user interface is so much better and easier
to understand - 'lost due to .. Python and the .. backend.)
That is to say: i agree with you.
I am psychologically experienced.
> Can someone with internal knowledge of cvs
> shed some light on this please?
>
> Thank you for your time
>
> Jan
--steffen
