On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:32:56PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 01:01:50PM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > hmm. i would argue that it's more rightly fw_update(8)'s place to go > > into that level of detail, not pkg_add(1). > > I agree. I'm not too fond of fw_update(1), though synching to the kernel > makes it a necessity. > > And pkg_add(1) documentation is already very long. > > I'm fine with a SEE ALSO .Xr fw_update 1 entry in pkg_add(1), though. >
the Xr, fine. what about the brief note i suggested? my worry is that reading the beginning of pkg_add, you'll have no idea that there even is such a thing. having an Xr will not help that case. it's doesn;t have to go in pkg_add(1), but i cannot think of a better place. jmc
