On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 01:01:50PM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote: > hmm. i would argue that it's more rightly fw_update(8)'s place to go > into that level of detail, not pkg_add(1).
I agree. I'm not too fond of fw_update(1), though synching to the kernel makes it a necessity. And pkg_add(1) documentation is already very long. I'm fine with a SEE ALSO .Xr fw_update 1 entry in pkg_add(1), though.
