Stuart Henderson wrote: > If this is related to sending huge LS updates, I don't think many > people currently running ospfd would hit it (you'd need to be announcing > quite a lot of networks into ospf), so you probably wouldn't have read > about it on the lists.
I was able to do some sniffing and can confirm that other routers in this same area do generate full MTU sized LS update packets. Based on this information I suspect that the bug that Claudio mentioned is what I've run in to. > You have a confirmed issue now, so -current isn't likely to make things > worse. (With daemons like this I'm usually happier running -current in > production than older code). This seems to imply that -current typically consists of bugfixes vs new features/enhancements? >> * Is the same bug in ospf6d? > > It looks like this probably is the case. Requesting a similar patch makes it into ospf6d if this is true. I'll be doing some OSPF cleanup as well as lab testing with the -current ospfd. Thanks, Chris
