Brett Lymn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Not cross compiling and actively discouraging cross compilation is why > > all OpenBSD architectures are constantly stress tested and therefore > > relatively stable while some other projects that shall not be named > > don't even have working boot blocks for the architectures they > > "support". > > > > tsk... others are not allowed to make errors? How is that related to > cross building anyway?
Understanding the answer to this question is the difference between having architectures that actually work and are used and architecutres that are "supported", meaning they are added to a long list. //art
