Thanks alot
for making it clear, gcc will be another problem.
but sometimes u really need to cross-compile os on another one as in
case of hurd.

On 7/10/05, Tom Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Maslan 10-Jul-05 08:16 >>>
> >
> > On 7/10/05, Maslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Pain let u learn more, besides i've some extra time. i used to make
> > > my own LFS, and i missing this in BSD.
> > > but what things i should consifer when trying so.
> > > the compiler are almost the same gcc.
> 
> "Almost the same"?
> 
> Have a look at gcc-local(1)*.  There are lots of differences between
> stock gcc and what we use on OpenBSD.  Several people have put a lot
> of work in here.  OpenBSD is an entire operating system, designed to
> be built on OpenBSD - and not even cross-compiled on a different
> processor architecture of the same operating system.
> 
> You may get small bits compiled, but you will find it very difficult
> to compile the whole system, and there will be subtle bugs that will
> take hours to track down.
> 
> > > and most of utils are so.
> > > so where is the problem.
> 
> "I have this engine - it came out of a Ferrari, so it's really good,
> and I want to use it - and a Ford Escort that I am really enjoy driving,
> even though it is 10 years old and the gears stick.  How can I fit the
> new engine into the Ford?  It's just a car and an engine.  Where is the
> problem?"
> 
> Tom
> 
> * 
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=gcc-local&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
> 


-- 
I'm Searching For Perfection,
So Even If U Need Portability U've To Use Assembly ;-)
http://www.maslanlab.org

Reply via email to