On 03/06/16 21:17, Daniel d'Andrada wrote: > Hi, > > I was working under the assumption that, in mir::scene::Surface, > input_bounds() was the bounding box of the input region [1]. But it > was always returning the full surface size no matter what. > > Then, checking implementation, I saw that it simply returns the > surface size. Is that the correct and intended definition of > input_bounds (there's no documentation on it, so its definition > follows from the implementation itself)? Wouldn't it be more useful > and accurate if it were the bounding box I thought it was? Or is it > just a bad by-product of having scene::Surface inherit from > input::Surface, making input_bounds() a redundant property of the former. > > - Daniel > > [1] by the way, why there's no input_region() getter in > scene::Surface? qtmir would sure make good use of it. Now it has to > rely on shell::WindowManager::modify_surface to get this information. >
Yes, this is broken. (In several ways.) Last time I discussed it with duflu I came away with the opinion that fixing it wasn't trivial as there are competing, incompatible assumptions around the code. -- Mir-devel mailing list Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
