+1 for blake2. Good adoption in other projects, addresses the need for speed.
Cheers, Jackson. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017, at 01:49 PM, John Tromp wrote: > dear Igno, > > > So I'm considering a switch to the Blake2 [3] hash function. It's extremely > > fast in software (faster than SHA256 and even MD5), has been shown to be as > > secure as SHA3, was designed independently and has been widely reviewed. > > > > Any strong opposition or concerns? > > On the contrary. I strongly support the switch to blake2. > > regards, > -John > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble > Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
