dear Igno, > So I'm considering a switch to the Blake2 [3] hash function. It's extremely > fast in software (faster than SHA256 and even MD5), has been shown to be as > secure as SHA3, was designed independently and has been widely reviewed. > > Any strong opposition or concerns?
On the contrary. I strongly support the switch to blake2. regards, -John -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
