Re: use of HTML in AddressModifyCode

[Earl Hood]

On May 26, 2002 at 21:56, J C Lawrence wrote:

> Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > The AddressModifyCode works on the raw data.  As for using "&#046;" is
> > address obfuscation, it is a very weak form since any decent address
> > harvester would expand entity references before doing detection.  
> 
> A minor aside:
> 
>   Is the address modification code smart enough to NOT munge
>   Message-IDs?

Making me look at the code again ...

Yes, it is smart enough.  There is a hash defining the fields that
can have AddressModifyCode applied to them.  Here are the fields that
apply:

    apparently-from
    apparently-to
    bcc
    cc
    dcc
    from
    reply-to
    resent-cc
    resent-from
    resent-sender
    resent-to
    return-path
    sender
    to

(This should probably be configurable by a resource).

Note, the AddressModifyCode is applied during the HTML generation
portion.  Anything stored in the .mhonarc.db is in its raw form.

--ewh