Earl Hood wrote: > The AddressModifyCode works on the raw data. As for using > "." is address obfuscation, it is a very weak form since any > decent address harvester would expand entity references before > doing detection. Why not use something like: > > <AddressModifyCode> > s/\./ dot /g; > s/\@/ AT /g; > </AddressModifyCode>
I think both entities and dot/at are equally weak against harvesters. Entities have the advantage of maintaining address appearance. -John -- OpenPGP encrypted mail welcome.
