Hi, On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:18:21PM +0530, Chirag Shilwant wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On 31/10/23 21:29, Ryan Eatmon via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > > > > > On 10/31/2023 10:44 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:04:32AM -0500, Ryan Eatmon via > > > lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > > > We want to add an image into the core bundle, but that image does not > > > > have any opkg .control files. tar apparently errors out if you ask it > > > > to extract out files but the files are not in the archive, and the > > > > recipes are setup that if any of the commands in the shell error out, > > > > then the entire recipe fails. > > > > > > > > Simple fix, add an || (or) condition to the tar command to print a > > > > message that there were not any control files instead of erroring out. > > > > > > So, simply bypassing tar error due to missing *.control files still > > > won't > > > enable you to properly generate the SW manifest. As those *.control > > > files > > > from individual packages are parsed to extract the license information. > > > And they are missing because tiny image specifically disables "package > > > management" to save on space. Therefore tiny image was not included in > > > the bundle, since it doesn't generate the SW manifest. > > > > And this is why I sent the patch in rather than just taking it. This > > patch was a response to Chirag running in the above error when trying to > > add the tiny image into the core bundle in the processor sdk. > > > > So, why do we want to add tiny to the bundle? > > > We got a requirement from Bin Liu to add tiny-image in > /board-support/prebuilt-images/ of the SDK bundle. > I'm not sure about the "why do we want it to the bundle" part. Adding Bin to > provide more insights on the requirement part.
The tiny image is very small and uses SysVInit. It has been used in many use cases, initramfs is the most important one as far as I am aware. -Bin. > > Regards, > Chirag > > > Since tiny should be a subset of the other images, is there anything > > not covered in the software manifest that should prevent this patch? > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-sw-manifest.bbclass | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-sw-manifest.bbclass > > > > b/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-sw-manifest.bbclass > > > > index 14d14f08..b9c63610 100644 > > > > --- a/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-sw-manifest.bbclass > > > > +++ b/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-sw-manifest.bbclass > > > > @@ -405,10 +405,10 @@ sw_manifest_target() { > > > > # Only extract tar.gz or tar.bz2 types > > > > if [ -e > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem/${image}-${MACHINE}.tar.xz ] > > > > then > > > > - tar xJf > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem/${image}-${MACHINE}.tar.xz -C > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem --wildcards *.control > > > > + tar xJf > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem/${image}-${MACHINE}.tar.xz -C > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem --wildcards *.control || echo "No > > > > control files found in ${image}" > > > > elif [ -e > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem/${image}-${MACHINE}.tar.gz ] > > > > then > > > > - tar xzf > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem/${image}-${MACHINE}.tar.gz -C > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem --wildcards *.control > > > > + tar xzf > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem/${image}-${MACHINE}.tar.gz -C > > > > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/filesystem --wildcards *.control || echo "No > > > > control files found in ${image}" > > > > fi > > > > done > > > > -- > > > > 2.17.1 > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14995): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/message/14995 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/102297493/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
