On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Francisco Jerez <curroje...@riseup.net> wrote: >> Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Generated by >>> >>> sed -i -e 's/\.bits\././g' *.c *.h *.cpp >>> sed -i -e 's/dw1\.//g' *.c *.h *.cpp >>> >>> and then reverting changes to comments in gen7_blorp.cpp and >>> brw_fs_generator.cpp. >>> >>> There wasn't any utility offered by forcing the programmer to list these >>> to access their fields. Removing them will reduce churn in future >>> commits. >>> >>> This is C11 (and gcc has apparently supported it for sometime >>> "compatibility with other compilers") >>> >>> See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Unnamed-Fields.html >> >> This is also used from C++ source where anonymous structs are not part >> of any released standard. > > That is true. I have built this series with both clang-3.6 and > gcc-4.4.7. I don't think it's a problem.
FWIW the min supported compiler by mesa is GCC 4.2. I believe this is the last pre-GPLv3 version, and used by the BSD's. -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
