On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 November 2015 at 00:29, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Generated by >> >> sed -i -e 's/\.bits\././g' *.c *.h *.cpp >> sed -i -e 's/dw1\.//g' *.c *.h *.cpp >> >> and then reverting changes to comments in gen7_blorp.cpp and >> brw_fs_generator.cpp. >> >> There wasn't any utility offered by forcing the programmer to list these >> to access their fields. Removing them will reduce churn in future >> commits. >> >> This is C11 (and gcc has apparently supported it for sometime >> "compatibility with other compilers") >> >> See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Unnamed-Fields.html > FYI on old versions of GCC where this extension is not enabled by > default, we flip in on. We're using -std=gnu99, although perhaps we > should use -fms-extensions - not a big deal either way.
I tested gcc-4.4.7 (the version RHEL 5 uses, IIRC) and it produced a Mesa capable of running glxgears :) _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
