On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 October 2015 at 23:58, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Initially just checks that sources are non-NULL, which would have >> alerted us to the problem fixed by commit 6c846dc5. > > What are the chances of combining this with and/or removing > fs_visitor::validate() ? Afaict both of these validations are at > different level and we do not have enough information within > brw_validate_instructions(), do we ?
Right, they'll validate different sets of things (that aren't possible for the other to validate), so both are useful and complementary. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
