On 17 August 2015 at 01:24, Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 29/07/15 19:20, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Below is the preliminary release schedule for Mesa 11.0.0 >>> >>> August 21st 2015 - Feature freeze/Release candidate 1 >>> August 28th 2015 - Release candidate 2 >>> September 04th 2015 - Release candidate 3 >>> September 11th 2015 - Release candidate 4/Mesa 11.0.0 >>> >> Considering the quiet acknowledgement, the above schedule will be taking >> place. >> >> Reminder: do push all your feature changes before the end of 21st August >> if you'd want them in for the next release. > > btw, at what point is it too late to bump libdrm version dependency? > I think I've tracked down root cause for stk hang issue, but fixing it > will require an dependency on new libdrm.. need to do a bit more > testing, but I'm 99% sure at this point.. > I don't think it's ever too late to bump a libdrm requirement, even on a stable release. It's a bit unfortunate (pick your fav. word) but if the libdrm API or the implementation is bugged, it's better to not use it rather than cause chaos imho.
> also, is there a recommended way to do something like '#if LIBDRM_XYZ >>= abc' in the code? If so I could make the mesa fix something that > is back-portable to older release branches and enabled conditionally > iff new enough libdrm_freedreno. Not sure if there is a recommended > way to handle that sort of scenario? > I would prefer if we opt against such conditionals, as in some cases distros build against X+10, whist still keeping the minimum requirement as X. Which can end pretty bad at runtime. Cheers, Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
