On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 August 2015 at 16:42, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> On 10 August 2015 at 20:36, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> >>>> Cc: mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org >>>> --- >>>> include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h >>>> b/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h >>>> index c01ee20..52eada1 100644 >>>> --- a/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h >>>> +++ b/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h >>>> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ CHIPSET(0x6608, OLAND_6608, OLAND) >>>> CHIPSET(0x6610, OLAND_6610, OLAND) >>>> CHIPSET(0x6611, OLAND_6611, OLAND) >>>> CHIPSET(0x6613, OLAND_6613, OLAND) >>>> +CHIPSET(0x6617, OLAND_6617, OLAND) >>> Has there been any ideas/plans on getting this information >>> consolidated in a single place ? >>> >>> It feels a bit "dirty" having the same information in four places - >>> kernel, libdrm, ddx, mesa. >> >> There's not really a good solution that I know of due to the way X >> works. > If I have to guess, obtaining OLAND via DRM_IOCTL_RADEON_INFO won't be > impacted by (nor have any impact on) how X works. Shouldn't this "just > work" or there is something subtly off with the idea ? Can you > elaborate what part of X might be an obstacle ?
IIRC, X decides what driver to load based on the pci ids they support rather than letting drivers claim their devices. It's remnant of the UMS days. Alex > >> Using xf86-video-modesetting saves one at least. And for >> amdgpu, we merged the surface manager into mesa rather than having it >> on libdrm since we always use glamor so we didn't need access to it in >> the ddx to support EXA. >> > True. Even if one day you want/have to do EXA xf86-video-amdgpu one > can always re-factor it out into libdrm_amdgpu. So the surface manager > is a win-win atm :) > > Thanks > Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
