On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 10 August 2015 at 20:36, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
>> Cc: mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org
>> ---
>>  include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h 
>> b/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h
>> index c01ee20..52eada1 100644
>> --- a/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h
>> +++ b/include/pci_ids/radeonsi_pci_ids.h
>> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ CHIPSET(0x6608, OLAND_6608, OLAND)
>>  CHIPSET(0x6610, OLAND_6610, OLAND)
>>  CHIPSET(0x6611, OLAND_6611, OLAND)
>>  CHIPSET(0x6613, OLAND_6613, OLAND)
>> +CHIPSET(0x6617, OLAND_6617, OLAND)
> Has there been any ideas/plans on getting this information
> consolidated in a single place ?
>
> It feels a bit "dirty" having the same information in four places -
> kernel, libdrm, ddx, mesa.

There's not really a good solution that I know of due to the way X
works.  Using xf86-video-modesetting saves one at least. And for
amdgpu, we merged the surface manager into mesa rather than having it
on libdrm since we always use glamor so we didn't need access to it in
the ddx to support EXA.

Alex
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to