On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> Hi Nanley, >> >> I was expecting to see some code dealing with the fact that the block >> sizes are all different. Did I miss it, or is that still on the TODO >> list? > > I think *most* of that code *should* already be there. In theory, > it's all keyed off of the block size provided by formats.csv. > However, given some of the rendering errors we're currently seeing, it > looks like it may need a little patching here and there. :-) > --Jason
Yep, you're right. I had assumed that there was hardcoding all over since we had only had 4x4 block formats, but looks like (a) it's not hardcoded, at least in a few critical places, and (b) FXT1 uses an 8x4 block size (although FXT1 is probably not *the* most popular compression format). Should be relatively straightforward to plumb all this through to gallium + freedreno + a4xx. Not sure when I'll have time for it though. -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
