On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Thomas Helland <thomashellan...@gmail.com> wrote: > The performance numbers (shader-db runtime) are: > > Difference at 95.0% confidence > -14.7608 +/- 3.36786 > -9.05064% +/- 2.06501% > (Original runtime was 160 seconds)
Good Work! I had one comment on the hash set patch. With that fixed, the series is Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstr...@intel.com> Probably want to give Eric a a couple of days to look at it too. > While the profile data looked promising for increasing the > table size we start with, decreasing load factor, and integer hashing, > there seems to be no benefit to shader-db runtime. > Therefore I have dropped these from the series. > > Thomas Helland (3): > util/tests: Expand collision test for hash table > util: Change hash_table to use quadratic probing > util: Change util/set to use quadratic probing > > src/util/hash_table.c | 102 +++++++++-------------------- > src/util/hash_table.h | 3 +- > src/util/set.c | 118 > ++++++++++++---------------------- > src/util/set.h | 3 +- > src/util/tests/hash_table/collision.c | 14 ++++ > 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.3.4 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
