Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 12:53:17 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvi...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 12:42:00 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvi...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> > Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 11:58:06 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvi...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> >> > Avoid redefined symbol errors in clang. Based on a suggestion from > >> >> > Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com> in > >> >> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19778. > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvi...@gmx.de> > >> >> > --- > >> >> > v2: - no change > >> >> > v3: - include util directory in Makefile.am in order to avoid > >> >> > relative > >> >> > > >> >> > include paths, > >> >> > > >> >> > - make tls entry points array const > >> >> > >> >> I adapted this patch as v4 to fit mesa v10.4.4, but it fails (see > >> >> log-file in attached tarball). > >> > > >> > the configure output says that visibility is not supported by your > >> > clang. > >> > Interestingly, it is supported here (also clang 3.6 from yesterday). > >> > What > >> > does config.log say about it? > >> > >> Unfortunately, I have killed the build-dir and trying the patch from > >> FreeBSD. I will rebuild and send you my config.log. > >> > >> Attached is my build-script for my llvm-toolchain. > > > > mmh, no compiler-rt? > > NO. > Can you explain why do I need it?
No, I was just following http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html where it looks like it is required. That's the only difference between your and my setup AFAICS.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
