On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:56:28PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> >> >> This causes a lot of warnings about unchecked type in >> switch statements - fix them later. > > The rest of the series fixes things in the compiler frontend but leaves > a lot unchecked in the compiler backend (at least in i965). Also we now > get complains in NIR. > Putting something intermediate to silence things that get fixed by the > series itself probably doesn't make sense but I wonder if we should > address NIR at least. Thoughts?
Like 95% of the reason I'm pushing on fp64 is so that it doesn't get held up on something like NIR support. I had this stuff working back in like last July... I'd rather just not worry about NIR here. The NIR people can figure out how to best integrate double support. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
