On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:04:13AM +0200, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:56:28PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com>
> >
> > This causes a lot of warnings about unchecked type in
> > switch statements - fix them later.
>
> The rest of the series fixes things in the compiler frontend but leaves
> a lot unchecked in the compiler backend (at least in i965). Also we now
> get complains in NIR.
> Putting something intermediate to silence things that get fixed by the
> series itself probably doesn't make sense but I wonder if we should
> address NIR at least. Thoughts?
Furthermore this patch introduces warnings in the uniform module test that
are not fixed by the rest of the series either:
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp: In function 'void
generate_data_element(void*, const glsl_type*, ir_constant*&, unsigned int)':
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp:83:14: warning: enumeration value
'GLSL_TYPE_DOUBLE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (type->base_type) {
^
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp:83:14: warning: enumeration value
'GLSL_TYPE_IMAGE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp:111:14: warning: enumeration value
'GLSL_TYPE_DOUBLE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (type->base_type) {
^
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp:111:14: warning: enumeration value
'GLSL_TYPE_IMAGE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp: In function 'void
verify_data(gl_constant_value*, unsigned int, ir_constant*, unsigned int,
unsigned int)':
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp:211:10: warning: enumeration value
'GLSL_TYPE_DOUBLE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (val->type->base_type) {
^
tests/uniform_initializer_utils.cpp:211:10: warning: enumeration value
'GLSL_TYPE_IMAGE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
