IMHO all the red blocks should stand for "not implemented". Whether "$driver could do it or not" that is highly individual and depends on the feature/extension and the actual hardware.
-Emil P.S. I don't work on the radeon drivers. On 05/09/14 20:54, Romain Failliot wrote: > So right now, if it's red it really means that the r300 could do it, but > it's not been implemented yet? > > > 2014-09-05 11:12 GMT-04:00 Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com>: > >> >> A lot of GL3 and GL4 features actually only require GL2 hardware and >> r300 should support them. >> >> Marek >> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Romain Failliot >> <romain.faill...@foolstep.com> wrote: >>> Hi guys! >>> >>> Little recap on my project. I don't know if've been there recently but >> there >>> has been some nice changes (thanks for the llvmpipe and softpipe cleanup >> by >>> the way). >>> http://creak.foolstep.com/mesamatrix/ >>> >>> I'm wondering if something could be done for the r300 status. I think it >>> will definitely be red since it's not possible for these GPU to handle >> these >>> extensions. Am I right? >>> If I find a nice solution that doesn't bloat up the text file, would it >> be >>> alright for you? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Creak >>> >>> 2014-08-25 15:13 GMT-04:00 Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> >>>> Also I think some features that were added to soft/llvmpipe were >>>> marked as swrast in GL3.txt. >>>> >>>> Marek >>>> >>> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
