On 19.08.2014 01:28, Connor Abbott wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >> On 16.08.2014 09:12, Connor Abbott wrote: >>> I know what you might be thinking right now. "Wait, *another* IR? Don't >>> we already have like 5 of those, not counting all the driver-specific >>> ones? Isn't this stuff complicated enough already?" Well, there are some >>> pretty good reasons to start afresh (again...). In the years we've been >>> using GLSL IR, we've come to realize that, in fact, it's not what we >>> want *at all* to do optimizations on. >> >> Did you evaluate using LLVM IR instead of inventing yet another one? >> >> >> -- >> Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com >> Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer > > Yes. See > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-February/053502.html > > and > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-February/053522.html
I know Ian can't deal with LLVM for some reason. I was wondering if *you* evaluated it, and if so, why you rejected it. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
