On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Bryan Cain <bryanca...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> >> Another apporach I've tried is to just use a TEMP register as the >> indirect offset here. Unfortunately this gets destroyed by >> st_glsl_to_tgsi's various optimizations which assume that temp >> registers can't be reladdr's and so messes up the values. I started >> adding support for that, but then quickly realized that was probably >> not the right thing to do. >> >> So... should I increase the number of address registers to 1? Or is >> there some other simple approach that I'm missing? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -ilia > > > The problem you are having with the optimizations in glsl_to_tgsi is > because, as you say, it doesn't check the reladdr fields when calculating > live intervals. I'm currently in the middle of reworking the live interval > calculation - if you don't mind waiting a day or two for me to finish the > patch set and send it to the list, I can add that change to the reworked > function in the patch set.
I can certainly wait a little while. However from everything I can tell, all current reladdr's are in the ADDR register file, so perhaps I should just stick with that? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
