On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Thorsten Glaser <t.gla...@tarent.de> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> Yes, implicit padding is definitely bad. I didn't realize I even had >> it in there, although I'm glad my STATIC_ASSERT did its job. There are > > ;-) > >> various references to patches, however I haven't seen any. Perhaps >> they're lost in my inbox, or they were never sent to mesa-dev, or >> something else. Could the patch author (or another interested party) >> send it as a proper patch to mesa-dev? Assuming it doesn't break x86, >> happy to check it in. > > Oh fun. I’m the patch author, and it was here: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=37;filename=mesa_10.2.3-1%2Bm68k.1.debdiff;att=1;bug=728053 > > I’ve attached the part you’re probably most interested in.
Thanks! Munged the commit description a little and pushed to the master branch. I think the patches for 10.2.4 have already been selected, so it should make its way into 10.2.5. -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
