On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 02:11:42 PM Cody Northrop wrote: [snip] > > Hi Cody, > > > > I noticed that the Piglit test is a hack to an existing SSO test - would > > it be > > possible to create a new Piglit test for this, and submit it to > > pig...@lists.freedesktop.org for inclusion upstream? It'd be great to > > have a > > regression test in place so we don't break it in the future. > > > > Yes, I'll create a different test and submit it for inclusion.
Great, thanks! > > Also, it apparently tries to use GLSL 1.40 in a legacy GL 3.0 context, > > which > > Mesa doesn't support. I had to hack Mesa to get it to run. > > > I just rebased the changes to latest mesa/piglit/waffle masters and the > test runs fine. :\ Anyway, I agree it has a couple problems and I'll > avoid them in the new version. Weird - perhaps I was running it wrong. I just applied the patch and ran ./bin/arb_separate_shader_object-rendezvous_by_location which complained about std140 being unknown. *shrug*
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
