Please see my Mesa patch which moves index_bias to an SGPR. Doing it conditionally would be messy.
Marek On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > On 26.04.2014 22:36, Marek Olšák wrote: >> From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com> >> >> Mesa needs one more SGPR, let's add 5 then, because it's a recurring issue. >> >> This is silly. Why cannot Mesa specify the calling convention? >> Now I have to break transform feedback to support ARB_draw_indirect until >> this patch is released. Or I'll have to wait until the release and then >> merge ARB_draw_indirect support. > > Can't you do it the way we did several times before: Land the LLVM > change, then land the Mesa change with the new functionality only > enabled if built against LLVM >= 3.5? > > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com > Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
