On 26.04.2014 22:36, Marek Olšák wrote: > From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com> > > Mesa needs one more SGPR, let's add 5 then, because it's a recurring issue. > > This is silly. Why cannot Mesa specify the calling convention? > Now I have to break transform feedback to support ARB_draw_indirect until > this patch is released. Or I'll have to wait until the release and then > merge ARB_draw_indirect support.
Can't you do it the way we did several times before: Land the LLVM change, then land the Mesa change with the new functionality only enabled if built against LLVM >= 3.5? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
