On 05/13/2013 05:10 AM, Chris Forbes wrote:
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes<chr...@ijw.co.nz> --- src/mesa/main/get.c | 6 +++++- src/mesa/main/get_hash_params.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/src/mesa/main/get.c b/src/mesa/main/get.c index f498118..593c75b 100644 --- a/src/mesa/main/get.c +++ b/src/mesa/main/get.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #include "texcompress.h" #include "framebuffer.h" #include "samplerobj.h" +#include "stencil.h" /* This is a table driven implemetation of the glGet*v() functions. * The basic idea is that most getters just look up an int somewhere @@ -675,7 +676,10 @@ find_custom_value(struct gl_context *ctx, const struct value_desc *d, union valu v->value_enum = ctx->Stencil.ZPassFunc[ctx->Stencil.ActiveFace]; break; case GL_STENCIL_REF: - v->value_int = ctx->Stencil.Ref[ctx->Stencil.ActiveFace]; + v->value_int = _mesa_get_stencil_ref(ctx, ctx->Stencil.ActiveFace);
I think this is incorrect. I tested with NVIDIA's driver and it returns the user's originally-specified value without any sort of masking.
Can you revert this chunk? Sorry I missed this earlier, I was on vacation. -Brian _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
