On 05/08/2013 09:57 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> writes:
Haswell has been broken on master for a surprisingly long time, since
commit
1dfea559c3 (Thu May 2 11:27:37 2013 -0700). Reverting that commit fixed
it
for me.
If it doesn't get properly fixed by the 7th day, I'd like to see the
guilty
patch reverted. A full week is too long for a platform under active
development
to be down.
Well, it was broken for 2 working days before I caught the bug myself
and posted a patch, which got (negative) review feedback at midnight.
QA caught the bug shortly after I posted the patch. I think you have
unreasonable expectations of turnaround time here for something that
wasn't even bisected and reported.
I admit I may have an unreasonable expectation here sourced in frustration.
The frustration, though, isn't a good excuse to be unreasonable.
Also HSW isn't hw the rest of the world has to worry about, whereas
SNB being broken for 3D at startup on every distro matters more. It
might not matter in your reporting and bonus structure but it sure as
hell matters to users :-)
Which is why I would have refused to revert it anyway. Released
hardware trumps prerelease hardware.
Strong point. When framed with that statement, my original message looks
extremely
foolish, doesn't it?
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
