Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Haswell has been broken on master for a surprisingly long time, since >>>> commit >>>> 1dfea559c3 (Thu May 2 11:27:37 2013 -0700). Reverting that commit fixed >>>> it >>>> for me. >>>> >>>> If it doesn't get properly fixed by the 7th day, I'd like to see the >>>> guilty >>>> patch reverted. A full week is too long for a platform under active >>>> development >>>> to be down. >>> >>> >>> Well, it was broken for 2 working days before I caught the bug myself >>> and posted a patch, which got (negative) review feedback at midnight. >>> QA caught the bug shortly after I posted the patch. I think you have >>> unreasonable expectations of turnaround time here for something that >>> wasn't even bisected and reported. >> >> >> I admit I may have an unreasonable expectation here sourced in frustration. >> The frustration, though, isn't a good excuse to be unreasonable. > > Also HSW isn't hw the rest of the world has to worry about, whereas > SNB being broken for 3D at startup on every distro matters more. It > might not matter in your reporting and bonus structure but it sure as > hell matters to users :-)
Which is why I would have refused to revert it anyway. Released hardware trumps prerelease hardware.
pgponLkaHHnPY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
