Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> writes: > _NEW_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK is not used by core Mesa, so it can be removed. > Instead, an new private flag is added to i965 to serve the same purpose. > > If you're new to this:
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> index 8c56245..083b619 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,6 @@ static struct dirty_bit_map mesa_bits[] = {
> DEFINE_BIT(_NEW_PROGRAM_CONSTANTS),
> DEFINE_BIT(_NEW_BUFFER_OBJECT),
> DEFINE_BIT(_NEW_FRAG_CLAMP),
> - DEFINE_BIT(_NEW_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK),
> DEFINE_BIT(_NEW_VARYING_VP_INPUTS),
> {0, 0, 0}
> };
There should be a corresponding DEFINE_BIT addition for
BRW_NEW_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK.
With that fixed in this patch and the NEW_RASTERIZER_DISCARD, these two
patches are:
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
I think that's all the review for this series now?
pgp7Qcs9nYLPN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
