On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > On Don, 2013-01-17 at 18:02 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On Don, 2013-01-17 at 17:56 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote: >> > Forking r600g was obviously a bad idea, because now radeonsi is just >> > as horrible as r600g used to be. >> >> What do you suggest? > > That's an honest question, BTW. It's certainly becoming increasingly > painful to port changes from r600g to radeonsi. The question is how we > could start sharing at least some code again. E.g. the state handling > has diverged quite a bit. Christian, any thoughts?
Perhaps we could restructure things a bit and maybe add a few chip specific function pointers and share a number of source files like we do for the radeon/r200 (and formerly r300c/r600c). Alex > > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com > Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
