On 09/28/2012 04:10 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> There are only a few patches left on master marked as candidates for the
> branch.  These basically fall into three groups:


> - TexImage performance improvement for Google Chrome.  There's still some 
> debate about whether or not these should be picked.
> 413c4914129cd26ca87960852d8c0264c0fb29e7 intel: Improve teximage perf for 
> Google Chrome paint rects (v3)
> b1d0fe022dc4826dadce014ab8fe062a82f75a16 intel: Fix segfault in 
> intel_texsubimage_tiled_memcpy
> b5891286202987dfc2606ac716050c0ee426de11 intel: Fix yet-another-bug in 
> intel_texsubimage_tiled_memcpy


These are a nice-to-have but not critical. I'd like to see them committed
because they improve Chrome's texture upload workload by 3-5x depending on
environmental factors. But I won't cry if people object.

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to