Hi,
On 7.10.2021 19.51, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 09:38, Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tammi...@intel.com> wrote:
This sounds horrible from the point of view of trying to track down
somebody who knows about what's & why's of some old commit that is later
on found to cause issues...
But why would your first point of call not be to go back to the review
discussion and look at the context and what was said at the time? Then
when you do that, you can see not only what happened, but also who was
involved and saying what at the time.
You're assuming that:
- The review discussion is still available [1]
- One can find it based on given individual commit
[1] system hosting it could be down, or network could be down.
It's maybe a bit contrived situation, but I kind of prefer
self-contained information. What, why and who is better to be in commit
itself than only in MR.
- Eero
