> I'm definitely biased :-), but I do find the changes at hand not that
> invasive: most of the logic is placed in helpers that are called in one
> or 2 places. I mean, removing those explicit flushes when the time
> comes shouldn't be too hard, and I do think it's one step in the right
> direction even though it's not the perfect solution yet.
> 
> Anyway, I guess having patch 1 to 23 merged would already
> significantly reduce my patch queue, and I'm definitely interested in
> working on the dep graph solution, so I'm not strongly opposed to the
> idea of dropping this patch. 

Okay, let's focus on patch 1 to 23 first. Once that's all through, we
can revisit :)
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to