> Alyssa: do you see any problem if we change to submit only one atom per > ioctl?
I don't think so; aesthetically I don't like the extra kernel traffic, but that's not a real concern, and it sounds like that's the correct approach anyway. A big reason we submit together on non-DRM is so we can get the kernel to deal with dependency tracking; if we have proper syncobjs/fences, that doesn't matter I don't think. > Guess syncobj refs are akin to GEM handles and fences to dmabuf buffers from > the userspace POV? *tries to figure out what the difference between GEM handles and dmabuf buffers* As in, syncobjs are within the driver, whereas fences can be shared across processes/parts of the chip and imported/exported? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
