Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> writes: > On 11/12/18 5:11 pm, Ian Romanick wrote: >> On 12/10/18 5:52 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote: >>> On 11/12/18 11:35 am, Ian Romanick wrote: >>>> It seems like someone already sent out patches to implement this, and we >>>> decided to not take it for some reason. Maybe it was Rob? >>> >>> I discovered a thread from the beginning of 2017 titled "feature.txt & >>> EXT_debug_label extension". But couldn't find any implementation. >>> >>> There was a reply from yourself, but it seems incorrect to me: >>> >>> "I checked both extensions, and they're not "just" aliases. The EXT adds >>> a single function with an enum to select the kind of object. The KHR >>> adds a function per kind of object. It would be easy enough to add, but >>> it seems more valuable to suggest the developer use the more broadly >>> supported extension." >> >> That's weird for a couple reasons. One, that's not even the discussion >> that I was thinking of. I'll check in the morning to see if I can find >> it. Two, I was clearly full of it... I really don't see how I came that >> conclusion. I don't even see any other related extensions that I could >> have been confusing either thing with. > > So do you think we should push this?
I don't see any piglit or CTS tests for this extension.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
