On 9 May 2012 20:07, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2012 14:32:18 -0700, Paul Berry <stereotype...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * Generate a set of aub file annotations for the current batch buffer,
> and
> > + * deliver them to DRM.
> > + *
> > + * The "used" section of the batch buffer (the portion containing batch
> > + * commands) is annotated with AUB_TRACE_TYPE_BATCH. The remainder of
> the
> > + * batch buffer (which contains data structures pointed to by batch
> commands)
> > + * is annotated according to the type of each data structure.
> > + */
> > +void
> > +brw_annotate_aub(struct intel_context *intel)
> > +{
> > + struct brw_context *brw = brw_context(&intel->ctx);
> > +
> > + unsigned annotation_count = 2 * brw->state_batch_count + 1;
> > + drm_intel_aub_annotation annotations[annotation_count];
> > + int a = 0;
> > + make_annotation(&annotations[a++], AUB_TRACE_TYPE_BATCH, 0,
> > + 4*intel->batch.used);
> > + for (int i = brw->state_batch_count; i-- > 0; ) {
> > + uint32_t type = brw->state_batch_list[i].type;
>
> Isn't the for loop start here off by one?
>
I don't think so. Note the postdecrement in the loop condition, so the
first time through the loop i == brw->state_batch_count - 1.
>
> Other than that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt
>
> feel free to just squash the configure.ac bump into this.
>
Ok, will do. I'll hold off on pushing this patch until after drm is
released so that nobody's build gets broken.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
