On 2018-11-27 19:53:38, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:26 PM Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> > wrote: > > On 2018-11-27 18:04:17, Matt Turner wrote: > > > By all means, require it (with a git hook) if you like. > > > > I personally don't want to push for that right now. > > > > I guess I would like it to be required someday, primarily because it > > creates a standard process for open source projects to use. (So, > > people are more likely to be used to it in general when contributing > > to open source projects.) > > > > But, I'm not confident that the consensus for Mesa would be in favor > > of making that change right now. So, as an alternative I'd like to > > remove any barriers (such as ambiguity) to its usage in Mesa. > > I don't think requiring S-o-b is onerous. Using S-o-b in a defined way > is just making explicit the current implicit promise to the community > that "I have the right to contribute this code" etc. I'm not sure why > you're hesitant.
Ok. I'll type that version up. -Jordan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
