On 2018-11-27 17:17:15, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 5:13 PM Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > This adds the "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" from the Linux > > kernel. It indicates that by using Signed-off-by you are certifying > > that your patch meets the DCO 1.1 guidelines. > > Do we gain anything if it's optional?
As I recall, one thing that bothered you about Signed-off-by in Mesa is that it wasn't documented what it meant when it was used. Perhaps there are developers that don't want to use Signed-off-by with an undocumented meaning for Mesa. If that is the case, then this might help. I wasn't sure if you fell into that category. I use -s whenever I commit, so requiring it would not bother me. But, I notice that many people (such as yourself) do not, so I didn't see the need to push for that. If it's well documented, and becomes commonly used, then perhaps requiring it might be a reasonable thing to consider. I won't be holding my breath while waiting on that. :) -Jordan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
